[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1487123931-56809-4-git-send-email-abanman@hpe.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 19:58:48 -0600
From: Andrew Banman <abanman@....com>
To: mingo@...hat.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
mike.travis@....com, rja@....com, sivanich@....com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, abanman@....com
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] x86/platform/uv/BAU: Add wait_completion to bau_operations
Remove the present wait_completion routine and add a function pointer by
the same name to the bau_operations struct. Rather than switching on the
UV hub version during message processing, set the architecture-specific
uv*_wait_completion during initialization.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Banman <abanman@....com>
Acked-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis@....com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h | 2 ++
arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Index: community/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h
===================================================================
--- community.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h
+++ community/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h
@@ -642,6 +642,8 @@ struct bau_operations {
void (*write_g_sw_ack)(int pnode, unsigned long mmr);
void (*write_payload_first)(int pnode, unsigned long mmr);
void (*write_payload_last)(int pnode, unsigned long mmr);
+ int (*wait_completion)(struct bau_desc*,
+ struct bau_control*, long try);
};
static inline void write_mmr_data_broadcast(int pnode, unsigned long mmr_image)
Index: community/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
===================================================================
--- community.orig/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
+++ community/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
@@ -23,9 +23,25 @@
#include <asm/irq_vectors.h>
#include <asm/timer.h>
+static int uv1_wait_completion(struct bau_desc *bau_desc,
+ struct bau_control *bcp, long try);
+static int uv2_3_wait_completion(struct bau_desc *bau_desc,
+ struct bau_control *bcp, long try);
+
static struct bau_operations ops;
-static struct bau_operations uv123_bau_ops = {
+static struct bau_operations uv1_bau_ops = {
+ .bau_gpa_to_offset = uv_gpa_to_offset,
+ .read_l_sw_ack = read_mmr_sw_ack,
+ .read_g_sw_ack = read_gmmr_sw_ack,
+ .write_l_sw_ack = write_mmr_sw_ack,
+ .write_g_sw_ack = write_gmmr_sw_ack,
+ .write_payload_first = write_mmr_payload_first,
+ .write_payload_last = write_mmr_payload_last,
+ .wait_completion = uv1_wait_completion,
+};
+
+static struct bau_operations uv23_bau_ops = {
.bau_gpa_to_offset = uv_gpa_to_offset,
.read_l_sw_ack = read_mmr_sw_ack,
.read_g_sw_ack = read_gmmr_sw_ack,
@@ -33,6 +49,7 @@ static struct bau_operations uv123_bau_o
.write_g_sw_ack = write_gmmr_sw_ack,
.write_payload_first = write_mmr_payload_first,
.write_payload_last = write_mmr_payload_last,
+ .wait_completion = uv2_3_wait_completion,
};
static struct bau_operations uv4_bau_ops = {
@@ -43,6 +60,7 @@ static struct bau_operations uv4_bau_ops
.write_g_sw_ack = write_gmmr_proc_sw_ack,
.write_payload_first = write_mmr_proc_payload_first,
.write_payload_last = write_mmr_proc_payload_last,
+ .wait_completion = uv2_3_wait_completion,
};
@@ -727,19 +745,6 @@ static int uv2_3_wait_completion(struct
}
/*
- * There are 2 status registers; each and array[32] of 2 bits. Set up for
- * which register to read and position in that register based on cpu in
- * current hub.
- */
-static int wait_completion(struct bau_desc *bau_desc, struct bau_control *bcp, long try)
-{
- if (bcp->uvhub_version == 1)
- return uv1_wait_completion(bau_desc, bcp, try);
- else
- return uv2_3_wait_completion(bau_desc, bcp, try);
-}
-
-/*
* Our retries are blocked by all destination sw ack resources being
* in use, and a timeout is pending. In that case hardware immediately
* returns the ERROR that looks like a destination timeout.
@@ -967,7 +972,7 @@ int uv_flush_send_and_wait(struct cpumas
write_mmr_activation(index);
try++;
- completion_stat = wait_completion(bau_desc, bcp, try);
+ completion_stat = ops.wait_completion(bau_desc, bcp, try);
handle_cmplt(completion_stat, bau_desc, bcp, hmaster, stat);
@@ -2176,11 +2181,11 @@ static int __init uv_bau_init(void)
if (is_uv4_hub())
ops = uv4_bau_ops;
else if (is_uv3_hub())
- ops = uv123_bau_ops;
+ ops = uv23_bau_ops;
else if (is_uv2_hub())
- ops = uv123_bau_ops;
+ ops = uv23_bau_ops;
else if (is_uv1_hub())
- ops = uv123_bau_ops;
+ ops = uv1_bau_ops;
for_each_possible_cpu(cur_cpu) {
mask = &per_cpu(uv_flush_tlb_mask, cur_cpu);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists