linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: add warning on %pk instead of %pK usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1487204389.6214.68.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Feb 2017 16:19:49 -0800
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     "Roberts, William C" <william.c.roberts@...el.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
        "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" 
        <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: add warning on %pk instead of %pK usage

On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 23:49 +0000, Roberts, William C wrote:
> > 
> > This means _all_ the $stat checks aren't being done on patches that add just a
> > single multi-line statement.
> > 
> > Andrew?  Any thoughts on how to enable $stat appropriately for patch contexts
> > with a single multi-line statement?
> 
> I'm for merging your patch as is, and then take up the fact that $stat is not working correctly
> as a separate change, does that seem reasonable?

Sure, Andrew Morton is the typical upstream path for checkpatch.
(cc'd)

Andy Whitcroft?  Any chance to look at this?