linux-kernel - Re: [RT] lockdep munching nr_list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1487256179.28442.8.camel@gmx.de>
Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:42:59 +0100
From:   Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RT] lockdep munching nr_list_entries like popcorn

On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 12:06 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:01:18AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 09:37 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > 
> > > ...
> > > > > swapvec_lock?  Oodles of 'em?  Nope.
> > > > 
> > > > Well, it's a per cpu lock and the lru_cache_add() variants might be called
> > > > from a gazillion of different call chains, but yes, it does not make a lot
> > > > of sense. We'll have a look.
> > > 
> > > Adding explicit local_irq_lock_init() makes things heaps better, so
> > > presumably we need better lockdep-foo in DEFINE_LOCAL_IRQ_LOCK().
> > 
> > Bah.
> 
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> #define PER_CPU_DEP_MAP_INIT(lockname)                          \
>         .dep_map = {                                            \
>                 .key = ({ static struct lock_class_key __key; &__key }), \
>                 .name = #lockname,                              \
>         }
> #else
> #define PER_CPU_DEP_MAP_INIT(lockname)
> #endif
> 
> #define DEFINE_LOCAL_IRQ_LOCK(lvar)                             \
>         DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct local_irq_lock, lvar) = {         \
>                 .lock = { .rlock = {                            \
>                         .raw_lock = __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED,  \
>                         SPIN_DEBUG_INIT(lvar)                   \
>                         PER_CPU_DEP_MAP_INIT(lvar)              \
>                 } }                                             \
>         }
> 
> That's fairly horrible for poking inside all the internals, but it might
> just work ;-

Weeell, I'm trying to cobble something kinda like that together using
__RT_SPIN_INITIALIZER() instead, but seems mean ole Mr. Compiler NAKs
the PER_CPU_DEP_MAP_INIT() thingy.

  CC      mm/swap.o
mm/swap.c:54:689: error: braced-group within expression allowed only
inside a function

	-Mike