linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/5] tpm_tis_spi: Check correct byte for wait state indicator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1487261306-2494-4-git-send-email-peter.huewe@infineon.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:08:24 +0000
From:   Peter Huewe <peter.huewe@...ineon.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
        <tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <peterhuewe@....de>,
        Christophe Ricard <christophe-h.ricard@...com>,
        "Peter Huewe" <peter.huewe@...ineon.com>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexander Steffen <Alexander.Steffen@...ineon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] tpm_tis_spi: Check correct byte for wait state indicator

Wait states are signaled in the last byte received from the TPM in
response to the header, not the first byte. Check rx_buf[3] instead of
rx_buf[0].

Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Fixes: 0edbfea537d1 ("tpm/tpm_tis_spi: Add support for spi phy")
Signed-off-by: Alexander Steffen <Alexander.Steffen@...ineon.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Huewe <peter.huewe@...ineon.com>
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c
index d782b9974c14..16938e2253d2 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_spi_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u8 len,
 				u8 *buffer, u8 direction)
 {
 	struct tpm_tis_spi_phy *phy = to_tpm_tis_spi_phy(data);
-	int ret, i;
+	int ret;
 	struct spi_message m;
 	struct spi_transfer spi_xfer = {
 		.tx_buf = phy->tx_buf,
@@ -85,25 +85,27 @@ static int tpm_tis_spi_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u8 len,
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto exit;
 
-	phy->tx_buf[0] = 0;
-
-	/* According to TCG PTP specification, if there is no TPM present at
-	 * all, then the design has a weak pull-up on MISO. If a TPM is not
-	 * present, a pull-up on MISO means that the SB controller sees a 1,
-	 * and will latch in 0xFF on the read.
-	 */
-	for (i = 0; (phy->rx_buf[0] & 0x01) == 0 && i < TPM_RETRY; i++) {
-		spi_xfer.len = 1;
-		spi_message_init(&m);
-		spi_message_add_tail(&spi_xfer, &m);
-		ret = spi_sync_locked(phy->spi_device, &m);
-		if (ret < 0)
+	if ((phy->rx_buf[3] & 0x01) == 0) {
+		// handle SPI wait states
+		int i;
+
+		phy->tx_buf[0] = 0;
+
+		for (i = 0; i < TPM_RETRY; i++) {
+			spi_xfer.len = 1;
+			spi_message_init(&m);
+			spi_message_add_tail(&spi_xfer, &m);
+			ret = spi_sync_locked(phy->spi_device, &m);
+			if (ret < 0)
+				goto exit;
+			if (phy->rx_buf[0] & 0x01)
+				break;
+		}
+
+		if (i == TPM_RETRY) {
+			ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
 			goto exit;
-	}
-
-	if (i == TPM_RETRY) {
-		ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
-		goto exit;
+		}
 	}
 
 	spi_xfer.cs_change = 0;
-- 
2.7.4