lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:54:43 -0800
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@...opsys.com>,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>,
        Joachim Eastwood <manabian@...il.com>,
        Phil Reid <preid@...ctromag.com.au>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...il.com>,
        Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 07/32] stmmac: Discard masked flags in interrupt status register

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>


[ Upstream commit 0a764db103376cf69d04449b10688f3516cc0b88 ]

DW GMAC databook says the following about bits in "Register 15 (Interrupt
Mask Register)":
--------------------------->8-------------------------
When set, this bit __disables_the_assertion_of_the_interrupt_signal__
because of the setting of XXX bit in Register 14 (Interrupt
Status Register).
--------------------------->8-------------------------

In fact even if we mask one bit in the mask register it doesn't prevent
corresponding bit to appear in the status register, it only disables
interrupt generation for corresponding event.

But currently we expect a bit different behavior: status bits to be in
sync with their masks, i.e. if mask for bit A is set in the mask
register then bit A won't appear in the interrupt status register.

This was proven to be incorrect assumption, see discussion here [1].
That misunderstanding causes unexpected behaviour of the GMAC, for
example we were happy enough to just see bogus messages about link
state changes.

So from now on we'll be only checking bits that really may trigger an
interrupt.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/3/413

Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@...opsys.com>
Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
Cc: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>
Cc: Joachim Eastwood <manabian@...il.com>
Cc: Phil Reid <preid@...ctromag.com.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...il.com>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac1000_core.c |    4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac1000_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac1000_core.c
@@ -305,8 +305,12 @@ static int dwmac1000_irq_status(struct m
 {
 	void __iomem *ioaddr = hw->pcsr;
 	u32 intr_status = readl(ioaddr + GMAC_INT_STATUS);
+	u32 intr_mask = readl(ioaddr + GMAC_INT_MASK);
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	/* Discard masked bits */
+	intr_status &= ~intr_mask;
+
 	/* Not used events (e.g. MMC interrupts) are not handled. */
 	if ((intr_status & GMAC_INT_STATUS_MMCTIS))
 		x->mmc_tx_irq_n++;


Powered by blists - more mailing lists