linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 12/32] ipv6: tcp: add a missing tcp_v6_restore

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:54:48 -0800
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 12/32] ipv6: tcp: add a missing tcp_v6_restore_cb()

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>


[ Upstream commit ebf6c9cb23d7e56eec8575a88071dec97ad5c6e2 ]

Dmitry reported use-after-free in ip6_datagram_recv_specific_ctl()

A similar bug was fixed in commit 8ce48623f0cf ("ipv6: tcp: restore
IP6CB for pktoptions skbs"), but I missed another spot.

tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock() can indeed set np->pktoptions from ireq->pktopts

Fixes: 971f10eca186 ("tcp: better TCP_SKB_CB layout to reduce cache line misses")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c |   24 +++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
@@ -987,6 +987,16 @@ drop:
 	return 0; /* don't send reset */
 }
 
+static void tcp_v6_restore_cb(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	/* We need to move header back to the beginning if xfrm6_policy_check()
+	 * and tcp_v6_fill_cb() are going to be called again.
+	 * ip6_datagram_recv_specific_ctl() also expects IP6CB to be there.
+	 */
+	memmove(IP6CB(skb), &TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->header.h6,
+		sizeof(struct inet6_skb_parm));
+}
+
 static struct sock *tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock(const struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
 					 struct request_sock *req,
 					 struct dst_entry *dst,
@@ -1178,8 +1188,10 @@ static struct sock *tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock
 						      sk_gfp_mask(sk, GFP_ATOMIC));
 			consume_skb(ireq->pktopts);
 			ireq->pktopts = NULL;
-			if (newnp->pktoptions)
+			if (newnp->pktoptions) {
+				tcp_v6_restore_cb(newnp->pktoptions);
 				skb_set_owner_r(newnp->pktoptions, newsk);
+			}
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -1194,16 +1206,6 @@ out:
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-static void tcp_v6_restore_cb(struct sk_buff *skb)
-{
-	/* We need to move header back to the beginning if xfrm6_policy_check()
-	 * and tcp_v6_fill_cb() are going to be called again.
-	 * ip6_datagram_recv_specific_ctl() also expects IP6CB to be there.
-	 */
-	memmove(IP6CB(skb), &TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->header.h6,
-		sizeof(struct inet6_skb_parm));
-}
-
 /* The socket must have it's spinlock held when we get
  * here, unless it is a TCP_LISTEN socket.
  *