linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] x86/paravirt: Change vcp_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:02:57 -0500
From:   Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
        Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
        Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
        Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] x86/paravirt: Change vcp_is_preempted() arg type
 to long

On 02/16/2017 11:09 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 04:37:49PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
>> The cpu argument in the function prototype of vcpu_is_preempted()
>> is changed from int to long. That makes it easier to provide a better
>> optimized assembly version of that function.
>>
>> For Xen, vcpu_is_preempted(long) calls xen_vcpu_stolen(int), the
>> downcast from long to int is not a problem as vCPU number won't exceed
>> 32 bits.
>>
> Note that because of the cast in PVOP_CALL_ARG1() this patch is
> pointless.
>
> Then again, it doesn't seem to affect code generation, so why not. Takes
> away the reliance on that weird cast.

I add this patch because I am a bit uneasy about clearing the upper 32
bits of rdi and assuming that the compiler won't have a previous use of
those bits. It gives me peace of mind.

Cheers,
Longman