[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170217090735.ls5pmtsfwkf3q5h6@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 10:07:35 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: xlpang@...hat.com
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>,
Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@...jp.nec.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: Keep quiet in case of broadcasted mce after
system panic
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 09:53:21AM +0800, Xunlei Pang wrote:
> It changes the value of cpu_online_mask/etc which will cause confusion to vmcore analysis.
Then export the crashing_cpu variable, initialize it to something
invalid in the first kernel, -1 for example, and test it in the #MC
handlier like this:
int cpu;
...
cpu = smp_processor_id();
if (cpu_is_offline(cpu) ||
((crashing_cpu != -1) && (crashing_cpu != cpu)) {
u64 mcgstatus;
mcgstatus = mce_rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS);
if (mcgstatus & MCG_STATUS_RIPV) {
mce_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS, 0);
return;
}
}
> Moreover, for the code(see comment inlined)
>
> if (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id())) {
> u64 mcgstatus;
>
> mcgstatus = mce_rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS);
> if (mcgstatus & MCG_STATUS_RIPV) { // This condition may be not true, the mce triggered on kdump cpu
> // doesn't need to have this bit set for the other cpus remain in 1st kernel.
Is this on kvm or on a real hardware? Because for kvm I don't care. And
don't say "theoretically".
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists