[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdK2sL1WyjfcRzQZ4Q+i5mnbcsYA4jPJhx=-g-e03KOog@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 11:23:45 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Phil Reid <preid@...ctromag.com.au>
Cc: thloh@...era.com, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: altera: Use handle_level_irq when configured as
a level_high
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Phil Reid <preid@...ctromag.com.au> wrote:
> When a threaded irq handler is chained attached to one of the gpio
> pins when configure for level irq the altera_gpio_irq_leveL_high_handler
> does not mask the interrupt while being handled by the chained irq.
> This resulting in the threaded irq not getting enough cycles to complete
> quickly enough before the irq was disabled as faulty.
> It looks like handle_level_irq should be used in this situation
> instead of handle_simple_irq.
> @@ -310,7 +310,8 @@ static int altera_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> altera_gc->interrupt_trigger = reg;
>
> ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add(&altera_gc->mmchip.gc, &altera_irq_chip, 0,
> - handle_simple_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
> + altera_gc->interrupt_trigger == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH ?
> + handle_level_irq : handle_simple_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
AFAIK, handle_bad_irq() should be used here.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists