linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] acpi: Fix the mapping handle in case of declaring processors using the Device operator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <32d3205d-f976-7b0d-3a5d-f2688280b836@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Feb 2017 09:48:48 +0800
From:   Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To:     Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>, <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        <rafael@...nel.org>, <lenb@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] acpi: Fix the mapping handle in case of declaring
 processors using the Device operator



At 02/16/2017 09:06 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2017/2/16 18:38, Dou Liyang wrote:
>> In ACPI spec, we can declare processors using both Processor and
>> Device operator. But now, we just handle the mapping of processors
>> which are declared by Processor operator.
>>
>> It misses the processors declared by Device operator.
>>
>> The patch adds this case of the Device operator.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 6 ++++--
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
>> b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
>> index 611a558..1aab5b0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
>> @@ -344,8 +344,10 @@ void __init acpi_set_processor_mapping(void)
>>  {
>>      /* Set persistent cpu <-> node mapping for all processors. */
>>      acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_PROCESSOR, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT,
>> -                ACPI_UINT32_MAX, set_processor_node_mapping,
>> -                NULL, NULL, NULL);
>> +                ACPI_UINT32_MAX, set_processor_node_mapping,
>> +                NULL, NULL, NULL);
>
> no need to update the code above.

Here is some format problem I fixed, but it looks like I didn't do
anything. I will modify it in next version.

>
>> +    acpi_get_devices(ACPI_PROCESSOR_DEVICE_HID,
>> set_processor_node_mapping,
>> +                NULL, NULL);
>
> It makes sense to me to add support for Processor devices of setting
> persistent cpu <-> node mapping, but I just wondering if there is no
> Processor device or Processor Operator for a processor entry(such as
> local apic, the spec didn't say it's a mandatory) in MADT,


It is in DSDT. Declare processprs like:

Processor (ProcessorName, ProcessorID, PBlockAddress, PblockLength) { 
ObjectList }

Or

Device (DeviceName) { ObjectList }

how do we
> set the mappings?

Step 1. we generate the logical CPU IDs by the Local APIC/x2APIC ID in
MADT. So, we have the mapping of CPU ID <-> Local Apic ID. We also can
get the mapping of Processor ID/UID <-> Local Apic ID directly in MADT.

  195 [0ECh 0236   1]                Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local 
APIC]
  196 [0EDh 0237   1]                       Length : 08
  197 [0EEh 0238   1]                *Processor ID : 40*
  198 [0EFh 0239   1]                *Local Apic ID : 40*
  199 [0F0h 0240   4]        Flags (decoded below) : 00000001
  200                            Processor Enabled : 1

So, at last, we get the mapping of

*Processor ID/UID <-> Local Apic ID <-> CPU ID*

Step 2. we can get *processorID/_UID <-> Node ID(_PXM)* in DSDT.

So, we get the maaping of *Node ID <-> CPU ID* according to

*Node ID(_PXM) <-> Processor ID/UID <-> Local Apic ID <-> CPU ID*

>
> BTW, multi places in the ACPI driver are using the same pattern here
> to scan all the processors, maybe we can add a function then call it
> to reduce some lines of code?
>

Yes, I think so.

Thanks,
Liyang.

> Thanks
> Hanjun
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>