lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:36:15 +0100 From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz> To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> Cc: mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PREVIEW 10/10] linkage: add .cfi_{start/end}proc to ENTRY/ENDPROC On 02/17/2017, 02:16 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:47:57AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> This is just a preview, not to merged now, only later with DWARF >> unwinder series. This is what the series will serve for (aside from >> cleanup and unification). >> >> I am aware of CFI_STARTPROC and CFI_ENDPROC left defined in other archs >> in spite of cfi annotations removal ages ago. For simplicity. I am using >> DW_ prefix here. > > If objtool is going to be generating CFI instructions, why not have it > generate .cfi_startproc and .cfi_endproc too? I tried that, but in many places it is very hard to recognize start and/or end of a function. Having .cfi_startproc and .cfi_endproc in place makes it rather easy, actually reduced to "emit dwarf instructions for this code between here and there". Plus pre-prepared .eh_frame only to be extended. (.eh_frame_hdr has to be rehashed of course.) thanks, -- js suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists