linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf stat: Add -a as a default target

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170217144359.GA11692@krava>
Date:   Fri, 17 Feb 2017 15:43:59 +0100
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf stat: Add -a as a default target

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:41:28AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 03:33:27PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:27:47AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 03:00:57PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > > Boris asked for default -a option in case we monitor
> > > > only uncore events. While implementing that I thought
> > > > it might be actually useful to make it overall default.
> 
> > > >   # perf stat
> > > >   Warning: No target specified, setting system-wide collection (-a).
> 
> > > Humm, would be interesting to disable this after a few warnings? Just
> > > one?
>  
> > not sure it's good idea to keep the count of that somewhere..
> > how about i make the warning smaller ;-)
>  
> >   # perf stat
> >   Forced system wide target.
> >   ...
>  
> > > BTW, this is how 'perf trace' works since day one, i.e. no target means
> > > system wide syscall tracing.
>  
> > or we could omit the warning completely as probably perf trace does
> 
> I think that we should have some note on the Documentation (have you
> added it?) and be done with it.
> 
> Another thing possiblity my mind, print that at the end? like:
> 
> perf record
> ^C[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data - system wide samples ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 1.738 MB perf.data (7565 samples) ]
> 
> ----------
> 
> Then people will thing, hey, so now it does systemwide samples when I
> pass no target, I don't have anymore to type _three_ keys! cool! :-)

ok, I'll check on that and send new version for the last 2 patches

thanks,
jirka