[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXhEsT4zpmkLwWafjX+oHHqcKDQ8-65JTFoNb5jwexwtA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 09:03:26 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] x86/selftests: add clobbers for int80 on x86_64
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 2:18 PM, <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On February 13, 2017 11:06:04 AM PST, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>>On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 2:13 AM, Dmitry Safonov
>><dsafonov@...tuozzo.com> wrote:
>>> Kernel erases R8..R11 registers prior returning to userspace
>>> from int80: https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/1/164
>>>
>>> GCC can reuse this registers and doesn't expect them to change
>>> during syscall invocation. I met this kind of bug in CRIU once
>>> gcc 6.1 and clang stored local variables in those registers
>>> and the kernel zerofied them during syscall:
>>>
>>https://github.com/xemul/criu/commit/990d33f1a1cdd17bca6c2eb059ab3be2564f7fa2
>>>
>>> By that reason I suggest to add those registers to clobbers
>>> in selftests. Also, as notted by Andy - removed unneeded clobber
>>> for flags in int 0x80 inline asm.
>>
>>Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
>>
>>Although these days we could preserve these regs in the kernel at the
>>cost of (I think) 4 bytes of text and zero runtime overhead.
>>
>>--Andy
>
> If we can do so that cheaply I think we should.
Sure, but we should still apply Dmitry's patches first.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists