[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170217025708.GH6814@wisp>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:57:08 -0800
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@...t42.net>,
Micha?? K??pie?? <kernel@...pniu.pl>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] fujitsu-laptop: renames and cleanups
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 02:42:00AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@...t42.net> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 02:46:23PM +0100, Micha?? K??pie?? wrote:
>
> > In summary, I see no issues with this patch series which provides a much
> > needed clean up of the code and naming conventions within the fujitsu-laptop
> > driver. I'm happy for this series (patches 1-10/10) to be applied.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@...t42.net>
>
> I have noticed people start using SoB for the code they are
> maintaining w/o sending any pull requests.
> It is okay, but there is, as Wolfram pointed, a downside for patchwork
> users. Patchwork is tracking tags (A/R/T) which by a glance allows to
> see what patches are acked/reviewed/tested.
Signed-off-by tracks the path the code takes from author to mainline. If you are
not the author or committing it to a tree followed by a pull-request, the
correct tag is "Reviewed-by".
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists