lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1487357213.13536.60.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Fri, 17 Feb 2017 19:46:53 +0100
From:   Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patchwork-lst@...gutronix.de,
        kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: unbind consumers before locking parent on
 device unbind

Am Freitag, den 17.02.2017, 10:42 -0800 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 07:36:29PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > On forced unbind the parent lock is taken, as the device might be a USB
> > device. The device to be unbound might have active consumers, which
> > must be unbound before calling device_release_driver(), otherwise this
> > function might deadlock when trying to take the parent lock during
> > consumer unbind.
> 
> Really?  What type of device does this fail on today?

Regular devices on a MMIO bus. __device_release_driver() will take the
parent lock unconditionally when it unbinds consumer devices. So if the
forced unbound device is on the same bus as the consumer we will
deadlock right there.

Regards,
Lucas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ