[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACvgo51vLca_Ji8VQBO5fqCrbhpm_=6mrqx1K-7GddVv5yMKWg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 20:39:33 +0000
From: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@...h.uni-bielefeld.de>,
ML dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] ARM: sun8i: a33: Mali improvements
Hi Maxime,
As I feared things have taken a turn for the bitter end :-]
It seems that this is a heated topic, so I'l kindly ask that we try
the following:
- For people such as myself/Tobias/others who feel that driver and DT
bindings should go hand in hand, prove them wrong.
But please, do so by pointing to the documentation (conclusion of a
previous discussion). This way you don't have to repeat yourself and
get [too] annoyed over silly suggestions.
- The series has code changes which [seemingly] cater for out of tree
module(s).
Clearly state in the commit message who is the user, why it's save to
do so and get an Ack from more prominent [DRM] developers.
Please try to understand that I do not want to annoy/agitate you, I'm
merely pointing what seems [to me] as incorrect.
Nobody is perfect, so if I/others are wrong do point me/us to a
reading to educate ourselves.
Thanks
Emil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists