linux-kernel - Re: e1000_netpoll() , BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAM_iQpVznUMtGJwC1Toa4X=dVtDigefZavUcQfFPk22YN5BxbA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Feb 2017 15:44:01 -0800
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...il.com>
Cc:     lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: e1000_netpoll() , BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...il.com> wrote:
>
> My card seems to use the e1000e driver which is buit-in..
>
> Anyway here an objdump -x :
>
> http://ftp.frugalware.org/pub/other/people/crazy/kernel/t/objdump-x_e1000.ko.txt
>

Found disable_hardirq() but not disable_irq().

Are you sure the kernel warning was emitted by this binary rather than
some old one?