[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28f6e48a-9c4e-82e8-d48a-6b5f7aaae768@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 09:15:49 +0900
From: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@...il.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
perf group <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [Suggestion/Problems] perf annoate: Some problems related to the
source code view and Improvement of it with line numbers
On 02/17/2017 10:29 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:33:29AM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
>> Hi, Arnaldo :)
>>
>> Regarding perf annotate:
>>
>> 1) Problem : wrong line numbers on perf-annotate (both stdio and TUI)
>> 2) Problem : wrong sum of overhead(percent) matching source lines
>> 3) Suggestion : new option showing only source code per function
>> with overhead info (to be more readable :) )
>>
>> I'll send the patchset for them, maybe it'll a bit take time.
>> But I won't be long..
>
> Concentrate on the first, send the patch, while waiting for review, work
> on the second, and so on :-)
>
> - Arnaldo
>
Understood!
I appreciate your concern :)
Thanks,
Taeung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists