[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170219091430.GL29622@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 09:14:41 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] overlay: fix inconsistency of ro file after copy-up
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 05:09:29PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> A file is opened for read-only, opened read-write (resulting in a copy up)
> and modified. The data read back from the the read-only fd will be stale
> in this case (the read-only file descriptor still refers to the lower,
> unmodified file).
>
> This patchset fixes issues related to this corner case. This is a
> requirement from various parties for accepting overlayfs as a "POSIX"
> filesystem.
>
> When an operation (read, mmap, fsync) is done on an overlay fd opened
> read-only that is referring to a lower file, check if it has been copied up
> in the mean time. If so, open the upper file and use that for the operation.
>
> To make the performance impact minimal for non-overlay case, use a flag in
> file->f_mode to indicate that this is an overlay file.
This is one hell of a DoS vector - it's really easy to eat tons of struct
file that way. Preparatory parts of that series make sense on their own,
but your "let's allocate a struct file, call ->open() and schedule that
struct file for closing upon the exit to userland on each kernel_read()"
is not.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists