[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170220091848.GQ21911@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:48:48 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
sboyd@...eaurora.org, nm@...com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
lina.iyer@...aro.org, rnayak@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/6] PM / domain: Save/restore performance state at
runtime suspend/resume
On 17-02-17, 15:58, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> writes:
>
> > With runtime PM, the devices get suspended while the system is up and
> > running in order to save power. At such times, it is important to
> > re-evaluate the required performance state of the domain, in order to
> > choose a lower state if possible.
> >
> > This patch updates the genpd suspend/resume callbacks to do that.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
>
> Doesn't this assume that a device in the domain would need to change
> performance state while runtime suspended. How would that happen?
>
> Rather than adding this here, I would think that drivers would instead
> remove any QoS requests before going into runtime suspend, which would
> trigger an update before runtime suspending.
Okay, lets leave it for the drivers, at least for the time being. I
will drop this patch.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists