[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170220202654.kakjxgmxrlhak6q3@pd.tnic>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 21:26:54 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: xlpang@...hat.com
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>,
Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@...jp.nec.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mce: Don't participate in rendezvous process once
nmi_shootdown_cpus() was made
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 09:29:24PM +0800, Xunlei Pang wrote:
> There is a small window between crash and kdump kernel boot, so
> if a SRAO comes within this window it will also cause the mce
> synchronization problem on the crashing cpu if we don't bail out the
> crashing cpu.
You mean, in the window between, kdump kernel starts writing out memory
and the second, kexec-ed kernel?
If so, please add that information to the place in do_machine_check()
where we check crashing_cpu so that we know why we're doing this
temporary ignore of #MC.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists