lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:36:28 -0800 From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Cc: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuahkh@....samsung.com, patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/32] 4.9.11-stable review Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:28:44AM -0800, kernelci.org bot wrote: >> stable-rc boot: 4 boots: 0 failed, 4 passed (v4.9.10-33-gf6f9e9361112) > > That's a small number of boots, really small, what went wrong here? > > Do you all need more time? We're going through some changes and are having to make some changes[1]. In this particular case, I think our builders were still being migrated to new hosts, so the builds weren't completed in time for the the labs to report in before the deadline. Kevin [1] https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/kernel-build-reports/2017-February/020074.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists