linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/32] 4.9.11-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m2tw7o32xf.fsf@baylibre.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:36:28 -0800
From:   Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        shuahkh@....samsung.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/32] 4.9.11-stable review

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:

> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:28:44AM -0800, kernelci.org bot wrote:
>> stable-rc boot: 4 boots: 0 failed, 4 passed (v4.9.10-33-gf6f9e9361112)
>
> That's a small number of boots, really small, what went wrong here?
>
> Do you all need more time?

We're going through some changes and are having to make some changes[1].
In this particular case, I think our builders were still being migrated
to new hosts, so the builds weren't completed in time for the the labs
to report in before the deadline.

Kevin

[1] https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/kernel-build-reports/2017-February/020074.html