[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170221084149.sjah7ozcqkpy3vhv@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 09:41:50 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: xlpang@...hat.com
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>,
Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@...jp.nec.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mce: Don't participate in rendezvous process once
nmi_shootdown_cpus() was made
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 09:28:20AM +0800, Xunlei Pang wrote:
> Not kdump kernel starts dumping, just during nmi_shootdown_cpus(), if some
> MCE comes after crashing_cpu was set and we don't skip crashing_cpu, then
> the crashing cpu will enter mce handler and trigger the synchronization issue.
Ok, I went and looked at __crash_kexec() - so we do nmi_shootdown_cpus()
as part of machine_crash_shutdown(). The next thing we do is kexec the
new kernel in machine_kexec(kexec_crash_image). The picture is clearer
now.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists