linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mtd: nand: Cleanup/rework the atmel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170221112720.ynehsryprhrhzjla@piout.net>
Date:   Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:27:20 +0100
From:   Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no>
Cc:     Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        "open list:MEMORY TECHNOLOGY..." <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
        Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...il.com>,
        Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...el.com>,
        Josh Wu <rainyfeeling@...look.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
        Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mtd: nand: Cleanup/rework the atmel_nand driver

(adding Hans-Christian)

On 21/02/2017 at 13:02:21 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Abusing platform data with pointers is also not welcome.
> 
> > (in this case, avr32).
> 
> It's dead de facto.
> 
> When last time did you compile kernel for it? What was the version of kernel?
> Did it get successfully?
> 

v4.10-rc3 was building successfully but had some issues in the network
code.

> When are we going to remove avr32 support from kernel completely?
> 

Ask that to the avr32 maintainers. It still builds and is still booted
by some people. And that actually seems to be you as you reported a bug
we introduced in 4.3. I don't think we had any other report after that.

It can be frustrating at times to handle that platform but if it is
working for someone, I don't see why we would remove it.


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com