linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] Input: tsc2007 - add a property "ti,report-resistance" to restore the old pressure reporting state if needed.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <FE6FEEC7-65B8-4C20-9C15-C641A8A8E4CA@goldelico.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:43:28 +0100
From:   "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, sre@...nel.org,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Input: tsc2007 - add a property "ti,report-resistance" to restore the old pressure reporting state if needed.

Hi Pavel,

> Am 21.02.2017 um 12:07 schrieb Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>:
> 
> On Mon 2017-02-20 17:56:36, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com>
> 
> No. device tree is for hardware description, not kernel configuration.

Yes, I agree. A new Kernel CONFIG would be better in this case.
I just did copy&paste from the old patch set without thinking that far.

Would

CONFIG_TSC2007_REPORT_RAW_RESISTANCE_AS_PRESSURE

be ok?

BR and thanks,
Nikolaus


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)