lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <62938e9e-6d25-80e3-2fb2-2812ad948605@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:49:07 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
        Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] x86/kvm: Reduce vcpu_is_preempted() overhead



On 20/02/2017 20:54, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 01:36:02PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
>> Waiman Long (2):
>>   x86/paravirt: Change vcp_is_preempted() arg type to long
>>   x86/kvm: Provide optimized version of vcpu_is_preempted() for x86-64
>>
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h      |  2 +-
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h     |  2 +-
>>  arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets_64.c     |  9 +++++++++
>>  arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c                | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c |  2 +-
>>  5 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> I'm assuming this will go through the KVM tree, if people want me to
> take it through the tip tree, please let me know.
> 
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...raded.org>

Applied, thanks.

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ