linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 33/33] mm, x86: introduce PR_SET_MAX_VADDR and PR_GET_MAX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJwJo6ajrum1AkMS4Mu7nXBzAui_9+fjARBN8NpsFEdA+ZeN7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:54:20 +0300
From:   Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 33/33] mm, x86: introduce PR_SET_MAX_VADDR and PR_GET_MAX_VADDR

2017-02-17 19:50 GMT+03:00 Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov
> <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>> This patch introduces two new prctl(2) handles to manage maximum virtual
>> address available to userspace to map.
...
> Anyway, can you and Dmitry try to reconcile your patches?

So, how can I help that?
Is there the patch's version, on which I could rebase?
Here are BTW the last patches, which I will resend with trivial ifdef-fixup
after the merge window:
http://marc.info/?i=20170214183621.2537-1-dsafonov%20()%20virtuozzo%20!%20com

-- 
             Dmitry