[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f3af75f3-2f75-195d-eeb4-5fbe04f98573@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 13:03:29 +0000
From: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: kbuild-all@...org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] ARM: NOMMU: Set ARM_DMA_MEM_BUFFERABLE for M-class
cpus
On 21/02/17 12:57, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 15/02/17 09:59, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>> Now, we have dedicated non-cacheable region for consistent DMA
>> operations. However, that region can still be marked as bufferable by
>> MPU, so it'd be safer to have barriers by default.
>
> Makes sense - plenty of cases want their DMA buffers to still be
> write-combining (e.g. framebuffers have already been mentioned here),
> for which strongly-ordered mappings won't do. Plus you don't exactly
> have a choice if you've no MPU and have fixed Normal attributes for your
> RAM region.
>
> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Thanks!
Vladimir
>
>> Tested-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>
>> Tested-by: Andras Szemzo <sza@....hu>
>> Tested-by: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mm/Kconfig | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
>> index 0b79f12..64a1465c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
>> @@ -1029,7 +1029,7 @@ config ARM_L1_CACHE_SHIFT
>>
>> config ARM_DMA_MEM_BUFFERABLE
>> bool "Use non-cacheable memory for DMA" if (CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K) && !CPU_V7
>> - default y if CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K || CPU_V7
>> + default y if CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K || CPU_V7 || CPU_V7M
>> help
>> Historically, the kernel has used strongly ordered mappings to
>> provide DMA coherent memory. With the advent of ARMv7, mapping
>>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists