lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 21 Feb 2017 08:39:30 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Jiancheng Xue <xuejiancheng@...ilicon.com>
Cc:     yanhaifeng@...ilicon.com, hermit.wangheming@...ilicon.com,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: hisilicon: add dts files for
 hi3798cv200-poplar board

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:55 AM, Jiancheng Xue
<xuejiancheng@...ilicon.com> wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 2017/2/16 7:26, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 03:07:07PM +0800, Jiancheng Xue wrote:
>>> Add basic dts files for hi3798cv200-poplar board. Poplar is the
>>> first development board compliant with the 96Boards Enterprise
>>> Edition TV Platform specification. The board features the
>>> Hi3798CV200 with an integrated quad-core 64-bit ARM Cortex A53
>>> processor and high performance Mali T720 GPU.

[...]

>>> +    soc {
>>
>> soc@0
>>
>>> +            compatible = "simple-bus";
>>> +            #address-cells = <1>;
>>> +            #size-cells = <1>;
>>> +            ranges = <0x0 0x00000000 0x0 0xffffffff>;
>>
>> Looks like everything is within 0xf8000000-0xfa000000. Can this range be
>> further restrained?
>>
> Actually, some modules of the SoC will be added in later. This range could be restrained
> to "0xf0000000-0xffffffff". If so, should soc node be named soc@...00000?

Yes.

Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists