linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] HID: rmi: fallback to generic/multitouch if hid-rmi is not built (was Re: [GIT PULL] HID for 4.11)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:46:44 +0100 (CET)
From:   Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Duggan <aduggan@...aptics.com>,
        Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
        Ping Cheng <pinglinux@...il.com>,
        Jason Gerecke <jason.gerecke@...om.com>,
        "linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: rmi: fallback to generic/multitouch if hid-rmi is
 not built (was Re: [GIT PULL] HID for 4.11)

On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> > I agree; that's in line with what we usually try to stick to (force
> > specific drivers if the device doesn't work with the generic at all and
> > switch over to generic in compile-time for devices that have limited
> > functionality with the generic driver).
> 
> .. and maybe we should do this same thing for the WACOM case a couple
> of lines up from your patch?

Well, that's far more questionable. I am pretty sure Wacom devices are 
completely dysfunctional without a specific driver, as they have their own 
protocol.

Adding Ping and Jason to CC.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs