[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170221205434.GD27653@uranus>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 23:54:34 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
akpm@...uxfoundation.org, avagin@...tuozzo.com,
xemul@...tuozzo.com, mtk.manpages@...il.com, kir@...nvz.org,
luto@...capital.net
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] fs,epoll: Add ability to call kcmp to find target files
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 03:32:21PM -0500, Jason Baron wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since an epoll fd can be added to another epoll fd, I'm wondering if you
> have enough data here to figure that out. The inode is the
> 'anon_inode_inode', so I'm wondering if that is sufficient to distinguish it
> from other anonymous inodes, or if an extra bit is required to indicate if
> the target file is in fact and epoll fd.
I think it should be ebough (together with sdev and pos). But will
look more closely tomorrow once I sit implementing criu support :)
(that's why it is early rfc, to gather comments)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists