[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170222050415.GC3817@X58A-UD3R>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 14:04:15 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
To: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org
Cc: ying.huang@...el.com, oleg@...hat.com, shli@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] sched: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing
llist API
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 04:26:29PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> Although llist provides proper APIs, they are not used. Make them used.
Hello,
What do you think?
>
> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 15 +++------------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index d01f9d0..8938125 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -1773,7 +1773,7 @@ void sched_ttwu_pending(void)
> {
> struct rq *rq = this_rq();
> struct llist_node *llist = llist_del_all(&rq->wake_list);
> - struct task_struct *p;
> + struct task_struct *p, *t;
> unsigned long flags;
> struct rq_flags rf;
>
> @@ -1783,17 +1783,8 @@ void sched_ttwu_pending(void)
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
> rq_pin_lock(rq, &rf);
>
> - while (llist) {
> - int wake_flags = 0;
> -
> - p = llist_entry(llist, struct task_struct, wake_entry);
> - llist = llist_next(llist);
> -
> - if (p->sched_remote_wakeup)
> - wake_flags = WF_MIGRATED;
> -
> - ttwu_do_activate(rq, p, wake_flags, &rf);
> - }
> + llist_for_each_entry_safe(p, t, llist, wake_entry)
> + ttwu_do_activate(rq, p, p->sched_remote_wakeup ? WF_MIGRATED : 0, &rf);
>
> rq_unpin_lock(rq, &rf);
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
> --
> 1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists