[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHv-k_8rgArzV2uQ64h1ZTNRpssX1jMf=RwuPoBmsjQ0FhCsWA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 11:42:28 +0530
From: Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@...aro.org>
To: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>
Cc: Oded <oded.golombek@....com>, Ofir <Ofir.Drang@....com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
Rajendra <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Milan Broz <gmazyland@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4] IV Generation algorithms for dm-crypt
Hi Herbert,
On 8 February 2017 at 13:02, Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:35 PM, Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@...aro.org> wrote:
>> ===============================================================================
>> dm-crypt optimization for larger block sizes
>> ===============================================================================
>>
>> Currently, the iv generation algorithms are implemented in dm-crypt.c. The goal
>> is to move these algorithms from the dm layer to the kernel crypto layer by
>> implementing them as template ciphers so they can be used in relation with
>> algorithms like aes, and with multiple modes like cbc, ecb etc. As part of this
>> patchset, the iv-generation code is moved from the dm layer to the crypto layer
>> and adapt the dm-layer to send a whole 'bio' (as defined in the block layer)
>> at a time. Each bio contains the in memory representation of physically
>> contiguous disk blocks. Since the bio itself may not be contiguous in main
>> memory, the dm layer sets up a chained scatterlist of these blocks split into
>> physically contiguous segments in memory so that DMA can be performed.
> Ran Bonnie++ on it last night (Luks mode, plain64, Qemu Virt platform
> Arm64) and it works just fine.
>
> Tested-by: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>
I was wondering if this is near to be ready for submission (apart from
the testmgr.c
changes) or I need to make some changes to make it similar to the IPSec offload?
Thanks,
Binoy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists