[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58AD4147.20801@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:44:07 +0300
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...tuozzo.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC: Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Vagin <avagin@...tuozzo.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Kirill Kolyshkin <kir@...nvz.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] procfs: fdinfo -- Extend information about epoll target
files
On 02/21/2017 10:16 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:41:12AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> Thus lets add file position, inode and device number where
>>> this target lays. This three fields can be used as a primary
>>> key for sorting, and together with kcmp help CRIU can find
>>> out an exact file target (from the whole set of processes
>>> being checkpointed).
>>
>> I have no problem with this, but I'm wondering whether kcmp's ordered
>> comparisons could also be used for this purpose.
>
> Yes it can, but it would increas number of kcmp calls signisicantly.
Actually it shouldn't. If you extend the kcmp argument to accept the
epollfd:epollslot pair, this would be effectively the same as if you
had all your epoll-ed files injected into your fdtable with "strange"
fd numbers. We already have two-level rbtree for this in criu, adding
extended ("strange") fd to it should be OK.
> Look, here is how we build files tree in criu: we take inode^sdev^pos
> as a primary key and remember it inside rbtree while we're dumping files
> (note also that we don't keep files opened but rather dump them in
> chunks). Then once we find that two files have same primary key
> we use kcmp to build subtree. This really helps a lot. And I plan
> to do the same with target files from epolls:
>
> - they gonna be handled after all opened files of all processes
> in container (or children processes if dumping single task),
> thus the complete tree with primary key already will be built
>
> - on every target file I calculate primary key and then using
> kcmp will find if file is exactly one matching
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists