[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1487758075.14159.3.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 02:07:55 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
simran singhal <singhalsimran0@...il.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH v2 2/7] staging: most: Using macro
DIV_ROUND_UP
On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 10:27 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > @@ -117,7 +118,7 @@ static int alloc_dbr(u16 size)
> > return DBR_SIZE; /* out of memory */
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < DBR_MAP_SIZE; i++) {
> > - u32 const blocks = (size + DBR_BLOCK_SIZE - 1) / DBR_BLOCK_SIZE;
> > + u32 const blocks = DIV_ROUND_UP(size, DBR_BLOCK_SIZE);
> > u32 mask = ~((~(u32)0) << blocks);
>
> Totally unrelated to DIV_ROUND_UP, would this code be a candidate for
> GENMASK?
Maybe "(1 << blocks) - 1" would be more intelligible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists