lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:45:08 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Block pull request for- 4.11-rc1

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>
> The fact is that we have two different sets, until we can yank
> the old ones. So I can't just ask one question, since the sets
> aren't identical.

Bullshit.

I'm, saying: rip out the question ENTIRELY. For *both* cases.

If you cannot yourself give a good answer, then there's no f*cking way
any user can give a good answer. So asking the question is totally and
utterly pointless.

All it means is that different people will try different (in random
ways) configurations, and the end result is random crap.

So get rid of those questions. Pick a default, and live with it. And
if people complain about performance, fix the performance issue.

It's that simple.

                Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ