[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170222224337.GE2449@lianli.shorne-pla.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 07:43:37 +0900
From: Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>, openrisc@...ts.librecores.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@...ck-us.net
Subject: Re: [OpenRISC] [PATCH v3 08/25] openrisc: add cmpxchg and xchg
implementations
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 04:30:35AM +1100, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 02/23/2017 01:20 AM, Stafford Horne wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:19:40PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 04:11:37AM +0900, Stafford Horne wrote:
> > > > + __asm__ __volatile__(
> > > > + "1: l.lwa %0, 0(%1) \n"
> > > > + " l.sfeq %0, %2 \n"
> > > > + " l.bnf 1f \n"
> > > > + " l.nop \n"
> > > > + " l.swa 0(%1), %3 \n"
> > > > + " l.bnf 1b \n"
> > > > + "1: l.nop \n"
> > > > + : "=&r"(old)
> > > > + : "r"(ptr), "r"(old), "r"(new)
> > > > + : "cc", "memory");
> > >
> > > I just noticed this, but having both labels have the same name is
> > > somewhat confusing.
> >
> > Right, better to use '2' for the second one.
>
> Better still to put the second label after the delay-slot nop.
> You don't need to execute that on the way out.
Right, thats a good point, lots of cases like this. I will go through
them.
> r~
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists