[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170223082619.b36fca9c6a91d48d6e8e2235@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 08:26:19 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@...aro.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"David A . Long" <dave.long@...aro.org>,
Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX PATCH V2 0/3] kprobes/arm: Improve kprobes
implementation on arm
On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 15:58:49 +0000
"Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-02-18 at 06:43 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 11:01:10 +0000
> > "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@...aro.org> wrote:
> [...]
> > > Meantime
> > > I'll investigate the kprobes test failures I see (which actually looks
> > > like cache/TLB issues and not test code problems after all).
> >
> > OK, btw, I couldn't reproduce the kprobes test failure with
> > CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA=y on qemu...
>
> That's because it's a problem with caches which qemu doesn't emulate.
> I worked out the cause and posted a patch...
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-February/489517.html
OK, I see.
Thanks!
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists