[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4f75e016-839a-3c19-0b28-d229faf25357@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 15:38:57 -0800
From: Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@...il.com>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, shawnguo@...nel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de, fabio.estevam@....com, mchehab@...nel.org,
hverkuil@...all.nl, nick@...anahar.org, markus.heiser@...marIT.de,
laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com, bparrot@...com,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, arnd@...db.de, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
minghsiu.tsai@...iatek.com, tiffany.lin@...iatek.com,
jean-christophe.trotin@...com, horms+renesas@...ge.net.au,
niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se, robert.jarzmik@...e.fr,
songjun.wu@...rochip.com, andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, shuah@...nel.org,
sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com, pavel@....cz,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerbeam@...tor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 23/36] media: imx: Add MIPI CSI-2 Receiver subdev
driver
On 02/17/2017 03:38 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 11:06 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:47:59AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 18:19 -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
>>>> +static void csi2_dphy_init(struct csi2_dev *csi2)
>>>> +{
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * FIXME: 0x14 is derived from a fixed D-PHY reference
>>>> + * clock from the HSI_TX PLL, and a fixed target lane max
>>>> + * bandwidth of 300 Mbps. This value should be derived
>>>
>>> If the table in https://community.nxp.com/docs/DOC-94312 is correct,
>>> this should be 850 Mbps. Where does this 300 Mbps value come from?
>>
>> I thought you had some code to compute the correct value, although
>> I guess we've lost the ability to know how fast the sensor is going
>> to drive the link.
>
> I had code to calculate the number of needed lanes from the bit rate and
> link frequency. I did not actually change the D-PHY register value.
> And as you pointed out, calculating the number of lanes is not useful
> without input from the sensor driver, as some lane configurations might
> not be supported.
>
>> Note that the IMX219 currently drives the data lanes at 912Mbps almost
>> exclusively, as I've yet to finish working out how to derive the PLL
>> parameters. (I have something that works, but it currently takes on
>> the order of 100k iterations to derive the parameters. gcd() doesn't
>> help you in this instance.)
>
> The tc358743 also currently only implements a fixed rate (of 594 Mbps).
I've analyzed the OV5640 video modes, and they generate the following
"sysclk"'s in Mhz:
210
280
420
560
840
But I don't know whether this is equivalent to bit rate. Is it the same
as Mbps-per-lane? If so, this could be indicated to the sink by
implementing V4L2_CID_LINK_FREQ in the ov5640.c sensor driver.
The Mbps-per-lane value would then be link_freq * 2, and then
Mbps-per-lane could be used to lookup the correct "hsfreqsel"
value to program the D-PHY.
I've added this to imx6-mipi-csi2.c. If the source didn't implement
V4L2_CID_LINK_FREQ then it uses a default 849 Mbps-per-lane.
Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists