[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170223005915.GG4003@jaegeuk.local>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 16:59:15 -0800
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
Cc: cm224.lee@...sung.com, yuchao0@...wei.com, chao@...nel.org,
sylinux@....com, miaoxie@...wei.com, bintian.wang@...wei.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: clean up codes in get_ssr_segment
On 02/22, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Yunlong,
>
> This is NOT clean-up. What's your point here?
I guess you wanted to do like this.
>From 8d344ac45890dd95c5734fd29a19a7c19364c327 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 20:50:49 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: do SSR for data when there is enough free space
In allocate_segment_by_default(), need_SSR() already detected it's time to do
SSR. So, let's try to find victims for data segments more aggressively in time.
Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index d01ee7b94702..c27dab43c42f 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -1541,7 +1541,7 @@ static int get_ssr_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type)
struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, type);
const struct victim_selection *v_ops = DIRTY_I(sbi)->v_ops;
- if (IS_NODESEG(type) || !has_not_enough_free_secs(sbi, 0, 0))
+ if (IS_NODESEG(type))
return v_ops->get_victim(sbi,
&(curseg)->next_segno, BG_GC, type, SSR);
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists