linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] [1/2] mmc: sdhci-cadence: Fix writing PHY delay

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNARW4zQ2OutrAfzkigt8OgMbAMbaLvTB2ZNfwbApHT=TEA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Feb 2017 20:28:51 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     Piotr Sroka <piotrs@...ence.com>
Cc:     linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [1/2] mmc: sdhci-cadence: Fix writing PHY delay

Hi.

2017-02-16 22:06 GMT+09:00 Piotr Sroka <piotrs@...ence.com>:
> Add polling for ACK to be sure that data are written to PHY register.
>
> Signed-off-by: Piotr Sroka <piotrs@...ence.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-cadence.c | 9 ++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-cadence.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-cadence.c
> index 4b0ecb9..c946e45 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-cadence.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-cadence.c
> @@ -65,11 +65,12 @@ struct sdhci_cdns_priv {
>         void __iomem *hrs_addr;
>  };
>
> -static void sdhci_cdns_write_phy_reg(struct sdhci_cdns_priv *priv,
> +static int sdhci_cdns_write_phy_reg(struct sdhci_cdns_priv *priv,
>                                      u8 addr, u8 data)


If you have a chance to submit v2,
I want the indent of the above line adjusted.


Otherwise,

Reviewed-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>




-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada