[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1487856552.4463.67.camel@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 14:29:12 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] x86/timers for 4.10
On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 11:26 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 09:20:06AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c
> > @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ void check_tsc_sync_source(int cpu)
> > > > > > if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_ADJUST))
> > > > > > > > atomic_set(&test_runs, 1);
> > > > > > else
> > -> > > > > > atomic_set(&test_runs, 3);
> > +> > > > > > atomic_set(&test_runs, 5);
>
> So
> > > atomic_set(&test_runs, max_t(unsigned int, 3, num_online_nodes() + 1));
I don't know that there is a correlation, ergo the "log" wording ;-)
-Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists