[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170223163737.GW6536@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:37:37 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Optimize pick_next_task for idle_sched_class too
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 04:25:33PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Ah, I read your question wrong. Yes I think you're right, we now loose
> the pull when the last RT task goes away.
>
> Hmm.. how to fix that nicely..
Something like so perhaps? This would make a pull happen when the last
RT task on this CPU goes away.
Steve?
---
diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index 9f3e40226dec..283d591078b0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -1336,6 +1336,9 @@ static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
dequeue_rt_entity(rt_se, flags);
dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p);
+
+ if (!rq->rt.rt_nr_running)
+ queue_pull_task(rq);
}
/*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists