linux-kernel - Re: making documentation targets on v4.10 with Fedora 25

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 23 Feb 2017 23:15:43 +0100
From:   Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>
To:     Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-doc <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: making documentation targets on v4.10 with Fedora 25



On 23.02.2017 20:44, Jim Davis wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:59 AM, Jani Nikula
> <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com> wrote:
>>> For the Sphinx targets, htmldocs, pdfdocs, epubdocs, and cleandocs
>>> failed.  cleandocs works without the O= argument, and arguably the O=
>>> thing isn't very useful with any of these targets, but it is supported
>>> by the top-level Makefile.
>>
>> Why do you say O= isn't useful with the targets?
>
> You're right, they are.  Silly me.
>
> Something like
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/Makefile.sphinx b/Documentation/Makefile.sphinx
> index 707c65337ebf..eb4294322150 100644
> --- a/Documentation/Makefile.sphinx
> +++ b/Documentation/Makefile.sphinx
> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ installmandocs:
>
>  cleandocs:
>         $(Q)rm -rf $(BUILDDIR)
> -       $(Q)$(MAKE) BUILDDIR=$(abspath $(BUILDDIR)) -C Documentation/media clean
> +       $(Q)$(MAKE) BUILDDIR=$(abspath $(BUILDDIR)) -C
> $(srctree)/Documentation/media clean
>
>  endif # HAVE_SPHINX
>
> seems to get cleandocs working again.

I guess the O= error was already patched:

   http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-doc/msg42989.html


-- Markus --

>
>