lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 23 Feb 2017 15:36:55 -0700
From:   Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests, x86, pkeys: test with random, unallocated
 protection keys

On 02/23/2017 03:26 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> Shuah, I assume you'll take this patch in through the selftests tree.

Yes I can do that.

-- Shuah

> 
> --
> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> The kernel pkeys code had a minor bug where it did some large shifts
> to an integer which is undefined behavior in C.  It didn't cause any
> real harm, but it is screwy behavior that the kernel should have
> rejected.
> 
> Add a test case for this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> ec: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
> Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: x86@...nel.org
> ---
> 
>  b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c |   25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
> 
> diff -puN tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c~pkeys-better-selftests-of-random-pkey tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c~pkeys-better-selftests-of-random-pkey	2017-02-23 14:21:05.168391529 -0800
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c	2017-02-23 14:23:03.244671815 -0800
> @@ -1123,6 +1123,30 @@ void test_pkey_syscalls_on_non_allocated
>  }
>  
>  /* Assumes that all pkeys other than 'pkey' are unallocated */
> +void test_pkey_syscalls_on_non_allocated_random_pkey(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
> +{
> +	int err;
> +	int nr_tests = 0;
> +
> +	while (nr_tests < 1000) {
> +		int test_pkey = rand();
> +
> +		/* do not test with the pkey we know is good */
> +		if (pkey == test_pkey)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		dprintf1("trying free/mprotect bad pkey: %2d\n", test_pkey);
> +		err = sys_pkey_free(test_pkey);
> +		pkey_assert(err);
> +
> +		err = sys_mprotect_pkey(ptr, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_READ, test_pkey);
> +		pkey_assert(err);
> +
> +		nr_tests++;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/* Assumes that all pkeys other than 'pkey' are unallocated */
>  void test_pkey_syscalls_bad_args(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
>  {
>  	int err;
> @@ -1320,6 +1344,7 @@ void (*pkey_tests[])(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
>  	test_executing_on_unreadable_memory,
>  	test_ptrace_of_child,
>  	test_pkey_syscalls_on_non_allocated_pkey,
> +	test_pkey_syscalls_on_non_allocated_random_pkey,
>  	test_pkey_syscalls_bad_args,
>  	test_pkey_alloc_exhaust,
>  };
> _
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists