[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170224091537.GA18182@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:15:37 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: hpa@...or.com
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
bp@...en8.de, jpoimboe@...hat.com, richard.weinberger@...il.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Implement __WARN using UD0
* hpa@...or.com <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> Incidentally, as an alternative to a #UD, int $9 could be an alternative
> (exception vector 9 was discontinued with the 486.)
With thousands of call sites a one byte opcode would be preferred, that's why INT3
is so nice.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists