[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170224094644.ify3fpzw33o754ra@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:46:44 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: hpa@...or.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
jpoimboe@...hat.com, richard.weinberger@...il.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Implement __WARN using UD0
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:15:37AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> With thousands of call sites a one byte opcode would be preferred, that's why INT3
> is so nice.
ICEBP is also a single-byte: F1. And should be pretty unused :)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists