linux-kernel - [PATCH] f2fs: select target segment with closer temperature in SSR mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170224104600.60557-1-yuchao0@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Feb 2017 18:46:00 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To:     <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <chao@...nel.org>,
        Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>,
        Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: select target segment with closer temperature in SSR mode

In SSR mode, we can allocate target segment which has different
temperature type from the type of current block, in order to avoid
mixing coldest and hottest data/node as much as possible, change
SSR allocation policy to select closer temperature for current
block prior.

Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
---
 fs/f2fs/segment.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 9eb6d89bf9e2..3a8a4d9888f1 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -1539,7 +1539,8 @@ static int get_ssr_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type)
 {
 	struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, type);
 	const struct victim_selection *v_ops = DIRTY_I(sbi)->v_ops;
-	int i, n;
+	int i, cnt;
+	bool reversed = false;
 
 	/* need_SSR() already forces to do this */
 	if (v_ops->get_victim(sbi, &(curseg)->next_segno, BG_GC, type, SSR))
@@ -1547,14 +1548,24 @@ static int get_ssr_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type)
 
 	/* For node segments, let's do SSR more intensively */
 	if (IS_NODESEG(type)) {
-		i = CURSEG_HOT_NODE;
-		n = CURSEG_COLD_NODE;
+		if (type >= CURSEG_WARM_NODE) {
+			reversed = true;
+			i = CURSEG_COLD_NODE;
+		} else {
+			i = CURSEG_HOT_NODE;
+		}
+		cnt = NR_CURSEG_NODE_TYPE;
 	} else {
-		i = CURSEG_HOT_DATA;
-		n = CURSEG_COLD_DATA;
+		if (type >= CURSEG_WARM_DATA) {
+			reversed = true;
+			i = CURSEG_COLD_DATA;
+		} else {
+			i = CURSEG_HOT_DATA;
+		}
+		cnt = NR_CURSEG_DATA_TYPE;
 	}
 
-	for (; i <= n; i++) {
+	for (; cnt-- > 0; reversed ? i-- : i++) {
 		if (i == type)
 			continue;
 		if (v_ops->get_victim(sbi, &(curseg)->next_segno,
-- 
2.8.2.295.g3f1c1d0