linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] iio: accel: adxl345: Add SPI support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VfnnCe40V9k9zqyt4rkUYHgTDjfJ-y2qNV7SCxpLqhOtg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Feb 2017 13:48:39 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
        Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>,
        Alison Schofield <amsfield22@...il.com>,
        Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@...g-vd.ch>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] iio: accel: adxl345: Add SPI support

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de> wrote:
> On 02/24/2017 10:12 AM, Eva Rachel Retuya wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 06:58:12PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de> wrote:
>>>> On 02/23/2017 05:43 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Eva Rachel Retuya <eraretuya@...il.com> wrote:

>> I'll revert to the explicit SPI/I2C pattern in order to give more
>> freedom in configuring as per the scenarios previously stated.
>
> Please check with Jonathan before you do, in the end he'll have to apply the
> patch.

+1. I will be fine with either just need to make sure maintainer
understands pros and cons.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko