linux-kernel - [PATCH] f2fs: add F2FS_DIRTY_DATA to has_not_enough_free_secs and need

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1487940393-26654-1-git-send-email-yunlong.song@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Feb 2017 20:46:33 +0800
From:   Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
To:     <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, <cm224.lee@...sung.com>,
        <yuchao0@...wei.com>, <chao@...nel.org>, <sylinux@....com>,
        <yunlong.song@...wei.com>, <miaoxie@...wei.com>
CC:     <bintian.wang@...wei.com>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: add F2FS_DIRTY_DATA to has_not_enough_free_secs and need_SSR

Currently, it miss the part of F2FS_DIRTY_DATA to check whether there is enough
free segments for the "reserved_sections" originally set in the mkfs.f2fs. As a
result, it will use the reserved_sections part to write dirty data, and has to
do gc_more to free a lot of sections together next time. This will cost much
time to do so many fggc. So let's add the F2FS_DIRTY_DATA part and do a few gc
gradually each time, which will avoid to do a large number of gc at the same time.

And this will also make sure the pre-set "reserved_sections" is not used all the
time and can be used anytime for gc when ssr segments are not enough.

Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
---
 fs/f2fs/segment.h | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
index f4020f1..44f2a46 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
@@ -490,12 +490,13 @@ static inline bool need_SSR(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
 	int node_secs = get_blocktype_secs(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES);
 	int dent_secs = get_blocktype_secs(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_DENTS);
 	int imeta_secs = get_blocktype_secs(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_IMETA);
+	int data_secs = get_blocktype_secs(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_DATA);
 
 	if (test_opt(sbi, LFS))
 		return false;
 
 	return free_sections(sbi) <= (node_secs + 2 * dent_secs + imeta_secs +
-						reserved_sections(sbi) + 1);
+						data_secs + reserved_sections(sbi) + 1);
 }
 
 static inline bool has_not_enough_free_secs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
@@ -504,13 +505,14 @@ static inline bool has_not_enough_free_secs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
 	int node_secs = get_blocktype_secs(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES);
 	int dent_secs = get_blocktype_secs(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_DENTS);
 	int imeta_secs = get_blocktype_secs(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_IMETA);
+	int data_secs = get_blocktype_secs(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_DATA);
 
 	if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
 		return false;
 
 	return (free_sections(sbi) + freed) <=
 		(node_secs + 2 * dent_secs + imeta_secs +
-		reserved_sections(sbi) + needed);
+		data_secs + reserved_sections(sbi) + needed);
 }
 
 static inline bool excess_prefree_segs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
-- 
1.8.5.2